Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 45(1): 57-69, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1712926

ABSTRACT

Provision of psychiatric services during the pandemic required flexibility, innovation, and collaboration. Going forward, telepsychiatry will offer accessible and effective treatment options. Increased collaboration with multidisciplinary providers, a critical component of effective treatment during the pandemic, should augment future treatment relationships. Large practice organizations continue to develop and disseminate best practices, and providers and institutions must continuously adapt and improve services. An increased focus on the utility of novel and innovative technology's role in psychiatry has emerged during the pandemic, and although openness to innovation will be critical, as will adherence to use of scientifically validated tools and procedures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychiatry , Telemedicine , Humans , Outpatients , Pandemics , Psychiatry/methods , Telemedicine/methods
2.
Telemed J E Health ; 27(8): 835-842, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1231014

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telehealth to deliver psychiatric services. Continuation of psychiatric services for individuals with high clinical acuity was critical. This study examined attendance to rapidly deployed telehealth services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals receiving intensive outpatient program (IOP), primarily group-based psychotherapy services for adults and adolescents by race/ethnicity, insurance, and clinical treatment program within a large hospital-based outpatient psychiatric setting. Methods: Chi-square tests compared whether attendance rates for telehealth versus in-person IOP services varied by population group, race, insurance, and clinical program, using observational data of adolescent and adult patients treated between October 1, 2019, and July 31, 2020. Results: Appointment attendance increased for telehealth versus in-person services for adolescents (χ2 (df = 1) = 27.49, p < 0.0001) and adults (χ2 (df = 1) = 434.37, p < 0.0001). For adults, increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed across insurance type (Medicaid: +11.5%; Medicare: +13.79%; Commercial: +6.94%), race/ethnicity (+6.23% to +15.76% across groups), and for IOP groups across all five diagnostic treatment programs (between 7.59% and 15.9% increases across groups). Adolescent results were mixed; increased appointment attendance for telehealth was observed among commercially insured youth (+7.11%), but no differences were observed for Medicaid-insured youth. Non-Hispanic white youth had increased attendance for telehealth (+8.38%) and no differences were observed for non-Hispanic black youth. Decreases were found in telehealth attendance for Hispanic/Latinx youth (-13.49%). Discussion: Rapidly deployed telehealth increased attendance to intensive services for psychiatrically high-risk individuals, particularly among adults and for adolescents with commercial insurance and non-Hispanic white youth. Trends among racial/ethnic and Medicaid-insured youth warrant further investigation regarding the potential for special challenges or vulnerabilities and advocacy needs. Findings highlight telehealth as an important tool in supporting availability of services for individuals with high levels of psychiatric acuity, particularly for group-based services, during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Hospitals , Humans , Medicare , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
3.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 27(9): 1420-1424, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-690364

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has demanded unprecedented actions in the delivery of outpatient psychiatric services, including the rapid shift of services from in-person to telehealth in response to public health physical distancing guidelines. One such shift was to convert group-level intensive outpatient psychiatric (IOP) interventions to telehealth. Historically, telehealth in psychiatric care has been studied in provider-patient interactions, but has not been as well studied for group telehealth service delivery. During the COVID-19 outbreak, providing group-based interventions was important in order to care for high-risk individuals who needed structured psychotherapy group support. However, the delivery of services via telehealth led to special challenges that were unable to be fully accommodated by the preexisting telehealth infrastructure. Rapid feasibility testing and adoption of technology was needed to support IOP services to minimize infectious spread while delivering group services to high-risk psychiatric patients. This article describes the processes and workflows for service delivery and early results of telehealth for IOP services in 2 adolescent treatment programs. In addition, the article highlights early observations around safety and quality and the role of telehealth policy and payment.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Adolescent , COVID-19 , Connecticut , Electronic Health Records , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Quality of Health Care , Telemedicine/methods
4.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 66: 89-95, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-642139

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically transformed the U.S. healthcare landscape. Within psychiatry, a sudden relaxing of insurance and regulatory barriers during the month of March 2020 enabled clinicians practicing in a wide range of settings to quickly adopt virtual care in order to provide critical ongoing mental health supports to both existing and new patients struggling with the pandemic's impact. In this article, we briefly review the extensive literature supporting the effectiveness of telepsychiatry relative to in-person mental health care, and describe how payment and regulatory challenges were the primary barriers preventing more widespread adoption of this treatment modality prior to COVID-19. We then review key changes that were implemented at the federal, state, professional, and insurance levels over a one-month period that helped usher in an unprecedented transformation in psychiatric care delivery, from mostly in-person to mostly virtual. Early quality improvement data regarding virtual visit volumes and clinical insights from our outpatient psychiatry department located within a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center reflect both the opportunities and challenges of virtual care for patients and providers. Notable benefits have included robust clinical volumes despite social distancing mandates, reduced logistical barrieres to care for many patients, and decreased no-show rates. Finally, we provide clinical suggestions for optimizing telepsychiatry based on our experience, make a call for advocacy to continue the reduced insurance and regulatory restrictions affecting telepsychiatry even once this public health crisis has passed, and pose research questions that can help guide optimal utilization of telepsychiatry as mainstay or adjunct of outpatient psychiatric treatment now and in the future.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Psychiatry/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/therapy
5.
Psychiatr Serv ; 71(7): 749-752, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-401824

ABSTRACT

In anticipation of a surge of COVID-19 cases in Northern California, the outpatient psychiatric clinic at UC Davis Health, in which 98% of visits initially occurred in person, was converted to a telepsychiatry clinic, with all visits changed to virtual appointments within 3 business days. The clinic had 73 virtual appointments on its first day after full conversion. This column describes the process, challenges, and lessons learned from this rapid conversion. Patients were generally grateful, providers learned rapidly how to work from home, and the clinic remained financially viable with no immediate losses.


Subject(s)
Change Management , Coronavirus Infections , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Outpatients , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Remote Consultation , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , California/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/trends , Organizational Innovation , Outpatients/psychology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Satisfaction , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Remote Consultation/methods , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL